Medical/Legal "experts" and rights-lobbyists, are so pro-active in fighting for the "right" to abortion, or turning a blind eye to terminally ill people visiting a euthanasia clinic in Switzerland to be put to death. They seem equally militant in physically stopping the parents of little Charlie Gard, taking him to America. Even if there may be little hope of a cure, should a law court hold sway over a baby's life, more than the parents trying to do all they can?
I know it's a difficult case but it is what's called a precedent. This precedent will flower in about 10 years time, into state-sanctioned 'life ending' on the whim of an "expert".
A Slippery slope! the opponents will say 'no it's not and that won't happen'. That's what they initially said about abortion of course - and yet now, the British Medical Council are voting to allow abortion right up until BIRTH for ANY reason. State killing, all round then. It seems the UK Government will soon need to open a new office... "The Ministry of Death"
Come back soon Lord Jesus... please
I know it's a difficult case but it is what's called a precedent. This precedent will flower in about 10 years time, into state-sanctioned 'life ending' on the whim of an "expert".
A Slippery slope! the opponents will say 'no it's not and that won't happen'. That's what they initially said about abortion of course - and yet now, the British Medical Council are voting to allow abortion right up until BIRTH for ANY reason. State killing, all round then. It seems the UK Government will soon need to open a new office... "The Ministry of Death"
Come back soon Lord Jesus... please
No comments:
Post a Comment